H        O        M        E

Chapter 1: CONNECTING LANGUAGE AND MUSIC

Linguistic processes in musical exploration

Theoretical approaches

Practical approaches

Aspects of linguistics in musicology and ethnomusicology

Aspects of linguistics as tools in musical analysis

Aspects of language as tools in computer music composition

Connections between music and poetry

Chapter 1

CONNECTING LANGUAGE AND MUSIC

                In the 1980's, uses of language or linguistic techniques in the analysis or composition of music were explored in some depth, especially in computer based composition of music. These explorations outline some methods for using aspects of language in musical composition. Focussing less on the possible relationships between the surface levels of music and language, these methods mostly clustered around the larger scale structural aspects of language and how to use them in composing music. Because they are based on what is actually heard, the surface relationships of music and language are most fertile for music composition.

                In the 1990's linguistic and language-based approaches have been less used and explored, or at least less documented, by computer/electronic music composers. This does not mean that language based approaches are less fertile or valid, just that the interests of these composers have shifted. Areas that now seem to have the interest of computer/electronic composers are based in science and mathematics, especially in the computer modelling of natural events, such as the flow of water, cellular automata, or the behaviour of flocks of birds.

Linguistic processes in musical exploration

                In 1932 musicologist Gustav Becking drew the relevance of phonology to music. He presented the paper Der musikalische Bau des Montenegrischen Volksepos where he pointed out a similar basic problem in phonology and musicology, that is: that musical construction and phonemic construction are culturally dependent[1]. This was probably the first contribution the relatively new science of linguistics made to musicology.

                Linguist Roman Jakobson

took up Becking's point stressing that the particular property of music, as of poetry, is that its conventions are wholly phonological in operation and do not concern etymology or vocabulary. He urged music analysts to study the model of phonology[2].

                Phonology, being the study of the sound systems of language, is an important area when discussing the similarities between music and language. If a musical composition is viewed as the organisation of a sound system then tools used in exploring the sound system of a language become appropriate. This use of linguistic tools is particularly appropriate for analysing highly stylised compositions such as those of the mid-century serial composers.

                Work relating linguistics and music fits into two broad categories: theoretical and practical. Below I give a brief background of some discussions relating linguistic theory and music. I then discuss in some of the writings more relevant to my explorations in greater detail, under the headings: Aspects of language in musicology and ethnomusicology; Aspects of language as tool in musical analysis; and Aspects of language as tools in computer music composition.

Theoretical approaches

                Since Chomsky's Syntactic Structures[3] and Aspects of the Theory of Language[4] there have been many attempts to use his systems for divining the root structures of language in the analysis and composition of music. Examples of these approaches are seen in the works of musicians, theoreticians and composers such as Leonard Bernstein, who suggests that "there are similar cognate functions operating in both music and

language which are discoverable by linguistic method"[5]; Lerdahl and Jackendoff, whose "theory of musical syntax  provides hypotheses about musical universals"[6].

                The studies of morphology and semiotics supply linguistic tools for exploring larger areas of language than phonology. Here the rules for ordering phones into syllables; syllables into words; and words into sentences and so on are explored. These tools can also be used to explore the unfolding of larger areas of music, such as notes into motifs; motifs into phrases; and phrases into sections, as explored by Roads[7] and Cope[8].

                The efforts of the first three theorists and composers are to create or suggest a general analytic process that can be used effectively for analysing tonal or non-tonal music. Cope, on the other hand, is more interested in using the same or similar linguistic concepts in the composition of music.

                Semiotics is another area where the linguistic process of investigation has been appropriated for musical research. Nattiez[9], Lidov[10], Smoliar[11] and Monelle[12] use this approach to divine and examine the unique laws that link musical events within a specific piece. Ethnomusicologists often look to the phonemic and semiotic structures of a culture's language when examining the evolution of its music and language. This can be seen in the work of Levman[13], Chenoweth[14], Bright[15] and Powers[16].

                Psychologists have used music to examine learning, human perception, recognition and parsing regarding memory and the perception of time. Music offers insights into these human mental processes that are not available when text is the only medium for testing. The works of Deutsch[17], Trainor and Trehub[18], Clynes[19] and Tsunoda[20] are examples of this.

                As the perception, recognition and parsing of information is important in artificial intelligence there is interest in codifying the perception of music and language. Programs based on linguistic premises, such as that of Terry Winograd[21], have been used to analyse tonal music. Marvin Minsky has suggested that the sonata form is an excellent process for introducing and teaching new information[22].

Practical approaches

                Aspects of speech are used to create both background and foreground structures in music. Steve Reich's Different Trains[23] and Paul Lansky's Smalltalk[24] are examples of speech being used to create musical surfaces. In Different Trains Reich uses the rhythm and melodic inflections of the recorded speech fragments to provide the rhythmic and melodic source for a string quartet, these fragments are heard throughout the composition. In Smalltalk  Lansky filters a recording of a conversation in such a way that the rhythm and melodic inflections of the conversation are enhanced while the denotative nature of the language is obscured. In each of these two cases the composer's approach is based not on linguistic theories but on a direct appropriation of speech to create music. This approach has a precedent in the approach of Guido of Arezzo.

            During the eleventh century Guido mapped vowel sounds to pitches to create liturgical melodies. His process was to match the distribution of vowel sounds to the distribution of pitches when composing plainsong. In this century the Young Farmers Claim Future, a group centred in Belgium, translate textual information into musical events using Opcode'sª MAX program. Their process is to "match distribution of text characters to distribution of pitches in classical tonal systems"[25].

            While there is a substantial amount of musical composition based on linguistic concepts textual composition based on or influenced by musical concepts is comparatively rare. One possible approach is that taken by John Cage in composing his Sixty-two Mesostics re Merce Cunningham[26]. By using a letter row, rather than a tone row, and applying an extremely rigorous approach based in those of serial composition, Cage's mesostics show a direct use of musical techniques to construct text. The result is words and word fragments that produce a language that flips in and out of English. When seen on the page the result is akin to the work of concrŽte poets in its visual representation. The computer program MESOLIST[27], used when composing the sixty-two mesostics, changes the fonts and font sizes of each letter based on I Ching principles. These changes can be used to represent possible pitch and amplitude changes in performance. By using these methods Cage accentuates the acoustic, not semantic, properties of the text and the result resembles a hybrid between sound poetry and vocal music.

            Another approach linking the sound of language and the sound of music is that offered by Bettina Knapp[28], who claims that phonemes are emotionally loaded. She uses this theory when discussing James Joyce's use of alliteration in his short story Eveline[29]. Knapp suggests that Joyce constructs his phrases musically, ensuring that the strategic rhythmic placement of particular phonemes reinforce the emotions he is trying to convey.

            The explorations listed above show some of the varied relationships that have been drawn between music and text. When used cooperatively the two can shed light on the culture and psychology of their practitioners, particularly offering insights into their subset, music theory. Practical cooperation between music and text can lead to expanded artistic horizons, as seen in some of the textual works of Cage.

Aspects of linguistics in musicology and ethnomusicology

                Language holds a fascination for musicologists and ethno-musicologists. Observing the similarities in a culture's music and its language and then contrasting them with those of other cultures is one method used to define the uniqueness of that culture.

                An example of this is given by William Bright when describing aspects of southern Indian instrumental music as:

largely based on vocal music [, therefore] we find patterns of speech reflected in [southern Indian] music of the flute or the violin  [and that] Indian poetry is normally recited in traditional melodic patterns, rather than simply spoken[30].

                Bright also sees that poetic metres are correlated with linguistic patterns in European cultures. He suggests that stress in English poetry is more important than the length of syllables, and that metres are based on the stress patterns of syllables. French poetry, on the other hand, has little contrast in syllable stress or length but has verse based on syllable count[31]. The different approaches to sound and rhythm in English and French poetry may be seen to have a correlation to the differences in musical style of the two cultures. This difference is more obvious in music prior to current times, where the ease and speed of communication has blurred cultural boundaries.

                Harold Powers gives another example of the similarities between music and language when comparing written western musical discourse to Indian classical music and Middle Eastern and South East Asian improvisations[32]. According to Powers written western music has very little scope for the improvisation that is a constant and integral part of verbal discourse. However, it can be said that verbal discourse follows strict rules, therefore we are not really inventing novel sentences when we speak but are making improvisations within set structures or making variations on themes. This process of improvisation is seen in classical Indian music and in the improvisations of the Middle East and South East Asia[33].

                In these cultures improvisations are guided by models and therefore have more parallels to language than improvisations which elaborate or are based on fixed items, such as the more Western styles of improvisation using figured bass notation, a chord structure, or the cadenza.

                Bryan Levman draws the most obvious similarities between music and speech. In his discussion of the origins of music and language, he states that the differences between the performance of music and language are of degree, not kind. Pitch, dynamics, duration and speed of articulation, timbre and articulation are all used in speech and music. In music the gamut of each of these areas is much wider than in speech[34].

                Levman sees three trains of thought in the field of music and language development:

                1. that music and language developed over separate paths and are of two distinct faculties, this is taken by glosso-geneticists, who specialise in language origin and evolution;

                2. that music evolved out of language, ie. song is exaggerated speech; and

                3. that music and language developed from the same inherent 'proto-faculty': as language became more expressive of ideas than feelings, accent decreased but consonantal articulation increased[35].

                 Music and singing are also used in rituals, and as ways of controlling the environment[36]. In these cases the lexical significance of the words is of less importance than the music. An example of this is the use of melisma in liturgical text, where the actual word may be obscured but its meaning heightened.

Aspects of linguistics as tools in musical analysis

                Musical analysis can fit into two broad categories: semantic analysis, dealing with the meaning of the composition; and structural analysis, dealing with how the composition is put together. These two areas are distinct but not exclusive, borrowing from and informing each other constantly. Four approaches are given below: Robert Hatten's[37] semiotic approach, Raymond Monelle's structural semantic approach[38], John Sloboda's[39] reductive semantic/grammatic approach and Lerdahl and Jackendoff's syntactic approach[40].

                Hatten argues that

competencies in semiosis embrace meanings besides the syntactic or formal[41]

and that

a semiotic perspective can take us beyond the perception of aural gestalts or processes to the cognition of a stylistic signification. [Therefore] music cognition can then be defined as the study of the stylistic competency as it guides not only identification but also interpretation of [the] significance of musical events.[42]

Therefore a semiotic understanding of a piece will include a syntactic or formal understanding.

                Monelle puts forward a number of linguistic terms taken from A. J. Greimas's SŽmantique structural in an analysis of Bach's Fugue in B flat minor, from Book I of Das Wohltemperierte Clavier. As the piece unfolds, each note, phrase, harmony and so on is placed in a context and therefore given a role, or semantic meaning. This results in, for example, the F A C triad having the role of the dominant chord and therefore creating a need for resolution in the listener, rather than a sense of repose. This context based understanding of the F A C triad is like the use of the word 'court' in Kafka's The Trial, where we understand it in a legal sense, not to mean 'royal entourage'. Monelle concludes that:

instrumental music lends itself to description in terms of structural semantics. The workings of semic nuclei, classemes, sememes, and isotopies are discerned. The distinction of sense, established by redundancy, and signification, by variancy, illuminates the musical features like variation, development and reprise[43].

                Monelle also suggests that for the piece to have meaning broad and detailed levels of understanding are required by the listener, ranging from an historic and stylistic knowledge to knowledge of the surface interactions within it. He suggests that at the surface level music relies on thematic and motivic repetition. This sort of repetition also occurs at the semantic level of language, where a writer may repeat an idea using synonyms, thus reducing the sense of repetition. A composer may use repetition to reinforce an idea and as a structural device[44].

                At a deeper level John Sloboda contrasts Monelle's view of the semantic similarities between music and language, putting forward that while Chomsky's deep structure and Schenker's Ursatz share similar ideas there are three significant contrasts between their views:

                1. Schenker's Ursatz  does produce a melody but Chomsky's deep structure does not produce a sentence;

                2. Schenker's Ursatz can be applied to long and complex pieces but Chomsky's deep structure can be applied only to sentences, and often results in simply a condensation of sentences; and

                3. The meaning of music is dependent on its surface structure, in fact there are very few different types of Ursatz, but the meaning of a sentence lies almost completely in its deep structure, of which there is an almost infinite amount[45].

Sloboda goes on to say:

One suggestion is that the mental substrate of music is something like that which underlies certain types of story. In these stories a starting position of equilibrium or rest is specified. Then some disturbance is introduced to the situation, producing various problems and tensions which must be resolved. The story ends with a return to the equilibrium. The underlying representation of music could be seen as a highly abstracted blueprint of such stories, retaining only the features they all have in common[46].

That is, the story or musical composition begins at a period of repose, moves to a period of agitation, and ends in a period of deeper repose; Schenker's I V I harmonic structure in tonal music.

                In A Generative Theory of Tonal Music composer Fred Lerdahl and linguist Ray Jackendoff put forward a theory whose "central purpose was to elucidate the organisation which the listener imposes mentally on the physical signals of tonal music"[47]. The theory of musical grammar they propose provides a hypothesis about musical universals which are appropriate regardless of style and of which certain aspects "constitute universals of musical perception and can be taken to represent innate aspects of musical cognition"[48].

                According to Harold Powers,

Preliminary investigations have indicated that [Lerdahl and Jackendoff's] theory can be modified to produce structural descriptions of pieces in styles as diverse as Macedonian folk music, North Indian music, and 14-century French music [ though] a limited amount of the world's music, notably a good deal of 20th-century art music, would not appear to meet all four conditions[49].

These conditions, or as Lerdahl and Chabot put it, hierarchical components, are:

1. grouping structure;

2. metrical structure;

3. time span reduction; and

4. prolongation reduction[50].

                Lerdahl and Jackendoff's concern with process rather than product, their use of well-formedness rules, and their use of reduction diagrams show the Chomsky influence in their approach.

Aspects of language as tools in computer music composition

                David Cope devised Experiments in Music Intelligence (EMI) to assist and provoke him in musical composition that fits his personal style and goals. This program assumes "that musical intervals can be defined linguistically and that style emanates from the manner in which composers catagorize (sic) these definitions"[51]. To ensure that the EMI parsing mechanism would be linguistically based EMI was

initially conceived and written to construct lexically correct haiku. This followed the principles that they:

(1) Have a correct number of syllables (1 2 2; 1 [2 or 3] [3 or 2] 1; [2 or 3] [3 or 2] for a total of 17 with lines 5/7/5 syllables)

(2) Be linguistically valid

(3) Be contextually meaningful

The following poem provides an example:

                                   A seagull flying

                                A nighttime talisman for

                                  Caressing startrails.

 These concepts were then translated, through surprisingly few adaptive alterations, to the musical parsing functions [used in Cradle Falling][52].

                Cope used a hierarchical system of identifiers, giving four types of musical events: Antecedent, Consequent, Ornament and Statement (ACOS). These areas each exist in three levels: foreground, middle-ground and background, the constraints on possible actions within the three areas become more rigorous as the levels get deeper[53].The composer sets the rules, weighting values and the style dictionary by which these areas interact.

EMI follows the general principles of sentence parsing [using augmented transition networks (ATN)]  In the case of natural language, prepositions require subsequent noun phrases and verbs are preceded by nouns or noun phrases and followed by nouns or noun phrases. Flexibility, however, abounds in this linguistic approach. Noun phrases can be staccato two- or three-word structures or extended sections with furthest sub phrases. The same is functionally true in EMI with the design of large scale works of music. Phrases vary in length content and meaning, but style dictates that rule apply and that certain events inevitably require certain reactions[54].

                Cradle Falling, for soprano and chamber ensemble, was composed by Cope using EMI, which provided about one-third of the piece. Prior to the composition Cope created an extensive dictionary of his style, thereby ensuring that the computer would produce something that he would see as musically valid and that would fit his body of works. He has also created dictionaries which follow the rules and styles of other composers, including Bach, Beethoven and Bartok[55]. Figure 1.1 is an example which

demonstrates the line-producing characteristics of the EMI system with an attached Cope-style dictionary.  The letters and numbers indicate the entrances of other instruments with the same material at different tempi, creating a heterophonic texture[56].

Figure 1.1. Heterophonic texture created with Cope's EMI system.

                When composing Stelling VI. Stephen Dydo developed the program 'LIMID', which creates music, and text related to that music, from a set of user input words and morphemes. He sees the relations between music and language as co-incidental rather than confluent, for example, seeing the intonation curves of speech as creating a 'speech melody'. To illustrate this point, Dydo refers to the

classical song of the Sung dynasty, where the tonal features of the language were used as compositional determinants. [That is] the melody was created from the pitch contours of the words[57].

 Thus the classical song of the Sung dynasty is a historical precedent to text generating melody and to Dydo's approach.

                Dydo took a set of pitch curves typical of American speech, each containing three pitch levels and of five lengths, from short exclamations to long and complex phrases. From this data he formed a

library of timbre definitions  vocal in quality [and] imitative of some typical American speech types. However, the extent to which they resembled actual speech was sharply curtailed by a number of factors:

                [1] only two formants could be specified;

                [2] the projection of the pitches was regarded as being of overriding importance, so that a kind of singing, rather than speaking was imitated;

                [3] most of the sounds had to function both in isolation and in conjunction with other sounds, so the natural permutations caused by sounds being adjacent to other sounds was not taken into account; and

                [4] the sounds had to function over relatively huge registeral and durational domains, necessitating compromises with the concept of truly human sounds[58].

                When linking the pitch curves he found that the phrases "formed a sentence which would typically be inflected with that pitch curve when uttered by an American."[59] Figure 1.2a shows a melody generated by the LIMID program and function tables used when assigning the sounds, that is, the tables of subjects, verbs, objects and so on. Figure 1.2b shows the resulting words used.

Figure 1.2a. A melody generated by LIMID assigning sounds to Subjects, Verbs and Objects.

Figure 1.2b Words attached to the melody generated by LIMID

                Fred Lerdahl and Xavier Chabot developed a theory that music and poetry have fundamental similarities and went on to produce a very simple melody based on Shakespeare's Sonnet 29. Their summary of the componential mappings between music and poetry is shown in Table 1.1 below[60]:

Table 1.1 Lerdahl and Chabot's summary of the componential mappings between music and poetry

Music

Poetry

grouping                                =

prosodic hierarchy

meter                                     =

meter

time-span reduction           =

phonological stress hierarchy,

timbrel prolongation           =

phonological prolongational structure

pitch prolongation               =

semantic prolongational structure

                From this mapping they develop a hierarchy of semantic, timbrel and metrical attributes, much like the structural tree diagrams and reduction maps of Lerdahl and Jackendoff's A Generative Theory of Tonal Music. To give an example of the technique samples are taken from a reading of Shakespeare's Sonnet 29 and used as a base from which the theory can be tested. The first line of the sonnet is shown in Figure 1.3[61].

Figure 1.3 Lerdahl and Chabot's melody based on Shakespeare's Sonnet 29.

                These three approaches show the forging of concrete relationships between text and music. Cope takes a structural approach, making the connection obvious through his parsing of sentence structures; Dydo produces a melody and an accompanying text, each of which are based on both intonation and sentence structures; and Lerdahl and Chabot use the actual sonic structure of a line of poetry as a starting point to a musical composition. In each case the composers have been at pains to ensure that their work has a concrete and well defined relationship to a natural language, English in this case.

Connections between music and poetry

                Unlike a painting or a sculpture, where it is possible for one to view the entire artwork in one moment and to then review specific areas at leisure, music and poetry can only be experienced over a period of time, the length of which is dictated by the performer or reader. Within the context of time music and poetry share three similar areas: the sonic, the structural and the cognitive.

                In the sonic area, music and poetry exist as purely physical events, the motion of air particles. These events can be measured using amplitude against time graphs; decoded using spectrographs; and described or notated in ways which do not consider the perceived meaning of the information, such as musical scores or written transcriptions. These methods of transcription have no audible quality as they are not in the sonic domain, therefore they are divorced from the sonic events they are representing. By notating and describing the sonic area of a poem or musical composition it becomes possible to gain a deeper understanding of the rules, or grammar, that give structure and cohesion to the sonic surface, thus illuminating the structural area.

                Examining the structural area through a visual representation of the sonic string will often show a deep, well understood, and well used knowledge of the various grammars of music and poetry. These grammars operate on microscopic and macroscopic levels, concerning, for example, the note to note relationships in traditional harmony or the phoneme to phoneme relationships in a given language, or on the macroscopic level, the rules concerning phrase or sentence construction or the structure of a poem or musical composition.

                Knowledge of any given grammar can be acquired at a very early age and there is much evidence to show that humans are predisposed to learning the various grammars of different languages[62], both musical and linguistic. Because this learning happens at an early age it can appear to be intuitive, and we become so accustomed to this knowledge that we often take it for granted, incorporating it seamlessly and essentially into daily life. An example of knowledge of musical grammars and styles can be seen in a listener being able to tell if a performance of a twelve bar blues fits into the "jazz" idiom or the "heavy metal" idiom. This distinction is made quickly and accurately even though the tempo, harmonic structure and harmonic rhythm may be very similar.

                The cognitive area concerns how the sonic input is interpreted by the listener. This level can be divided into three realms of exploration: psychological, considering how the sonic information is being understood; physical, considering how the sonic information is being computed and what physical changes are occurring in the brain and body; and semiotic/semantic, considering how the listener relates the sonic input to extra-musical events or items. In each of these cases the skill and education of the receiver governs their ability to decode the transmission and the methods used to decode it.



 

 



[1] Ian Bent and William Drabkin, Analysis., London, Macmillan Press, 1987, p. 59 The musical construction of the Montenegrin popular epic, my translation of the title.

[2] ibid.. p. 59.

[3] Noam Chomsky, Syntactic Structures., The Hague, Mouton, 1957.

[4] Noam Chomsky, Aspects of the Theory of Syntax,. Cambridge, Mass, MIT Press, 1965.

[5]Leonard Bernstein, The Unanswered Question: Six Talks at Harvard., Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, 1976, p. 56.

[6] Fred Lerdahl and Ray Jackendoff, 'Toward a Formal Theory of Tonal Music', Journal of Music Theory 21.1, 1977, p.166.

[7] Curtis Roads, 'Grammars as Representations for Music.' in Curtis Roads and John Strawn, eds. Foundations of Computer Music. Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press, 1985, pp. 403-442.

[8] David Cope, 'An Expert System for Computer Assisted Composition.' Computer Music Journal. 11.No. 4. (Winter), 1987, pp. 30-46.

[9] Jean-Jaques Nattiez, Music and Discourse. Toward a Semiology of Music. Translator. Carolyn Abbate. New Jersey, Princeton University Press, 1990.

[10] David Lidov, On Musical Phrase. Montreal, York Unversity, 1975.

[11] Stephen W Smoliar, 'Music Programs: An Approach to Music Theory Through Computational Linguistics.' Journal of Music Theory 20, 1976, pp. 105-131.

[12] Raymond Monelle, 'Structural Semantics and Instrumental Music.' Music Analysis 10.1-2, 1991, pp. 73-88.

[13] Bryan G. Levman, 'The Genesis of Music and Language.' Ethnomusicology, 36.2, Spring/Summer, 1992, pp. 147-170.

[14] Vida Chenoweth, Melodic Perception and Analysis. Ukarumpa, Papua New Guinea, Summer Institute of Linguistics, 1974.

[15] William Bright, 'Language and Music: areas for cooperation.' Ethnomusicology, 7, 1963, pp. 26-32.

[16]Harold S Powers, 'Language Models and Musical Analysis.' Ethnomusicology 24, 1980 pp. 1-59.

---Harold S Powers, 'The Structure of Musical Meaning: A View from Banaras.' Perspectives of New Music 14 Spring-Summer/Fall-Winter, 1976, pp. 308-334.

[17] Diana Deutsch, ed. The Psychology of Music. New York, Academic Press, 1982.

[18] Laurel J Trainor and Sandra E. Trehub, 'The Development of Referential Meaning in Music.' Music Perception 9.4 Summer 1992 pp. 455-470.

[19] Manfred Clynes, and James R. Evans, ed. Rhythm in Psychological, Linguistic and Musical Processes. Springfield, Illinois. C.C. Thomas, 1986.

---Manfred Clynes, ed. Music, Mind and Brain: the neuropsychology of music. New York, Plenum Press. 1982.

[20] T. Tsunoda, 'The difference in the cerebral processing mechanism for musical sounds between Japanese and non-Japanese and its relation to the mother tounge.' Contemporary Music Review 1. 1987, pp. 95-117.

[21] Terry Winograd, 'Linguistics and the Computer Analysis of Tonal Harmony.' Journal of Music Theory 12 1968 pp. 2-49.

[22] Marvin Minsky, 'Music, Mind, and Meaning.' Computer Music Journal 5.3, Fall 1981 pp. 31.

[23] Steve Reich, 'Different Trains.' Different Trains/Electric Counterpoint. Elektra/Asylum/Nonesuch, 1989.

[24] Paul Lansky, 'Smalltalk.' Smalltalk. New Albion Records, 1990.

[25] Jules Van Belle and GuyVan de Sompel, Email to max-mcgill@music.mcgill.ca max users news group. March 15 1994.

[26] John Cage, Sixty-two Mesostics re Merce Cunningham for Voice Unaccompanied using Microphone. Henmar Press Inc, 1971.

[27] Jim Rosenberg and Andrew Culver, Mesolist computer program.

[28] Bettina L Knapp, Music, Archetype and the Writer: A Jungian View. Pennsylvania, The Pennsylvania State University Press, 1988.

[29] James Joyce, ed. Robert Scholes. The Dubliners. New York, Penguin, 1983.

[30] William Bright, 'Language and Music: areas for cooperation.' Ethnomusicology 7, 1963 p. 27.<